A new "scandal" has shaken the Italian wikipedia. An anonymous (easily identifiable) sent me the following messages appeared in the comments to "The censors of Wikipedia":
1) You are absolutely right on the issue of clique of administrators in their early twenties . Should look at what happened just in the last hour.
2) tomorrow morning to link the actions blatantly corrupt performed this evening by some administrators.
3) Everything revolves around this question. http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Nyo/24_lug_2007
You Nyo first three weeks has been blocked by a single admin, without discussion, without the advice of other managers or other users.
has infiltrated the chat Journal of directors in the evening, because he understood how the situation was. E 'managed to extort a confession by the administrator valepert, confession that he later published in the bar that the page I linked.
The page was initially cleared completely, then purged the links to confession saved as a screenshot on photobucket. Now delete them also.
Valepert had confessed that the group of directors that govern Wikipedia does exist, and that the ban of Nyo had been treated by a maximum of 4 people, in private, on chat, including Aeternus and Jaqen.
chat functions as a meeting place. The admins are involved twenty, because the others are almost always absent.
Since few are all friends, they defend each other and act in a pack, getting rid of people who do not like.
Not everyone has the brain power overshadowed by neurosis. The same questions the valepert confessed.
probably in fear of being targeted and hunted as a "traitor" (as happened to the user / admin paulatz) last night has made some "crap" blocking suspected sock puppet that eventually turned out to be such.
Nyo was blocked (he moved to the criticism of administrators) three months from Jaqen without debate and opinions of the community. They work automatically and it is dangerous to question.
http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciale:Registri&type=block&page=Utente:Ruccuntu
Ruccuntu is not no sock, and valepert has not yet released.
Mr. Rubin, is actively involved.
My idea is to propose a reform of government so that there is a continuous supply of directors, and therefore do not become resistant and form cliques.
4) Note the massacre here
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Nyo/24_lug_2007 # Richesta_di_apertura_di_votazione
Of course I hasten to add to this anonymous and can 'make use of my blog for all its messages and complaints on Crack! And that goes for everyone else will have 'intention to fight any serious writing, to improve the Italian wikipedia.
I also want to bring in full as it appears on the Bar on 24.07.2007 "Dismissal of lobby reform, and sysops Administration:
".... Last night the Nyo held a lengthy discussion on the official chat of Wikipedia in which he finally managed to confess to the actual existence of the crack valepert administrators. After the undefinable
call last night for three weeks, and the complete ignorance (to ignore) in relation to the vote on the behavior of Robertoreggi, after looking for months the misbehavior of a dominant group of administrators here at Wikipedia, Nyo valepert did admit that the problem exists, is well founded and should be eradicated.
[dossier failed to respect the privacy of users involved: IRC logs are not public ndGiac83]
The admin involved are accused of violation of the rules of Wikipedia and abuse of power for the maintenance of the same and the same manipulation, exploitation of this group you need to get rid of admin and admin users should not be a genius.
valepert As stated by the mechanism criccarolo is bland. Users are indeed more or less always the same, but there are cases (like last night) where there are only two or three heads to make decisions for all (or absent or because others are not influential). But this makes the case even more damaging and serious than it would if the decisions were so many more.
The negativity of this issue are however, highlighted by Nyo in the discussion to better understand the issue is obviously good that you all read the entire text.
Interested users directly to the case of last night Jaqen Aeternus and, on that statement valepert are those who have made the decision last night. These users will proceed with a message of concern with particular emphasis on decision-makers have been the central issue of last evening.
All others who were implicitly or explicitly referred to or confirmed by valepert will undergo the same treatment, though with some discount. The minimum
deprivation remains to be done at all dell'adminship users explicitly mentioned and explicitly present in chat this morning and yesterday evening.
Cito particularly a couple of papers this morning [deleted as above, ndGiac83]: one that sheds light on what are the users who spend most of the time chatting, and that discovery will be judged by the admin and excluded from the community , and one that shows how it has changed Sogeking nickname at the time of the declarations of Helios, and finally, some fairly enlightening statements of Helios.
users directly involved in the issue of abuse are dell'adminship: Aeternus, Brownout, Fabexplosive, ChemicalBit, John, Helios, Jaqen, Laurentius, Holland, Otrebor81, Senpai, Skyluke, Sogeking, Tooby, and Wim Yerul. From his presence last night, and should include the declarations valepert Draco, his presence later this morning Loroli.
If you really want the good of Wikipedia, if you really consider yourself honest, well, it's time to admit their faults and defects, of returning to people and come out. This corruption can not go on like this. I wanted to specify that
Nyo sorry abusing the good faith of valepert Aeternus and the name, but for the good of all he (or I) had to do it. Excuse me ...." Finally
final outburst Ruccuntu and 'worthy of note:
"... The first thing I want to be released is to apologize to Valepert for the offenses that I launched, by anonymous, yesterday. I was exasperated. Regarding the rest I see that many have rummaged through my contributions and saw that I was merely to vote. Yesterday I ended up on the damn page before it was censored. In fact I started to write a speech when he disappeared and then reappeared later. The thing I did not like and I warmed up, maybe too much. I held the position of dictatorial giac83 (if you're so close there) and I made the report. If I'm wrong I'm ready to accept the consequences. Allegations of clones have already been able to verify my position. About 300 contributions achieved by editing here and there is a What we all do. I rarely plug in, partly because I felt very abused when I wrote the voice of the King Escape From that time my contribution is less convinced. Yesterday I heard thrown out without being able to defend myself. I contacted several admin, not only Montesacro, but also Al Pereira, Chemical Bit, Valepert, until I had the opportunity to talk with. JHC. which affected Snowdog. I tried to send a message to the mailing list, but I'm not good and I did not succeed. He said Freida saying that I had to register on another site and I went on tilt. If I can tell you that it is useful to the project is this: dates somehow blocked users the opportunity to speak. A bit like the famous call of the American (editor's note would be me, Louis and Bruno). After what happened yesterday (and today) I do not care to belong to this project. I know very well what is the way out finally and probably by tonight I will. What put me on an infinite sadness. Ruccuntu 18:03, 25 July 2007 (EDT) I read these
34Kb found a lot of superficiality and arrogance. I find that Jalo is a problem for this project, other than an admin. With this I close. Forever. I have instructed my lawyer to lodge a complaint at the police post in Pescara against all those who posted slanderous actions against me. Ruccuntu 18:45, July 25, 2007 (EDT)
The user was blocked indefinitely for legal threats mentioned above. - Toocome your name? 18:56, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
But how nice. Close here, perhaps without comments for or against this user and those here present. - (Y) Yuma - let's talk 19:06, 25 July 2007 (EDT) and finally ....."
'also noteworthy as the admin Yuma (happily) just as suffocating-and' used to do - any further comment on the scandalous affair, closing everything!
... And then there are some who are writing that there is no clique: but I do the pleasure! (in the words of Eduardo De Filippo) Prof. Maria Rubino
0 comments:
Post a Comment