Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Sleeping With Shoes On North Dakota

Distance from home with prayer heal

Amazed by being an honorable history of Christian Democratic Union, Mr. Mele, who said they had no problems liasson oorevoli had with ladies of high rim.

Mr. Cesa, secretary of Mr Mele, requested a salary increase to maintain contact with the family of senators and deputies.

Padawan dear, I hope you succeed beyond your nose you fail to understand this to be cheating. Members work hard but be pagatistra already.

Mele hope for him to forgive his wife and batons on her head does not, because it was weak, although, perhaps, next time do not go to Apple's Family Day.

The Force is with you that.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Online Movies Jesse Jane



All Wikipedians are equal but some are more equal than others - The palace AirMail ^ ^ 23:23, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Declaration (made together with criticism of members of the clique) cost the brave Italian wikipedia user The Palace of a block of one week.

What follows' appeared in the Bar of the Commons Italian two days before the shocking revelation of Nyo (?) on the admission of Valepert (a chat) the existence of the crack (shown in the front my post):

....." REGULATE THE Clique
Hi, I just read the old discussion "Wikipedia and its problems (trying to look at things with a bit of 'detachment)" and I must say that I think the problem is not so much' eventual formation of a "sect" or "corporation" internal, as each person is to himself. The problem is another, that is, when one of them foot down and bitter towards anyone in particular for any reason this early. The problem comes from here, and that is where the admin together sbarellano and behave really herd. Even before the most obvious reason by any user 's attacked by' admin in question, of course. Because if the 'user had actually wrong in front of the' intervention of 'admin then it is understandable. I do not mean that wikipedia is an oligarchy, even though you should create a sort of "discipline" and outside the admin that controls the behavior of the admin in respect of the normal users and that users could hurt to go in case of abuse suffered by the admin. In order to fairly decide who is right. As the 'current lack of fairness and control is the opposite of democracy .-- 151.21.208.182 06:34, 22 July 2007 (EDT) ...

If it were me, I would suggest a formula, however, opposite to that reported by many: I would leave a corner, why not, right here at the bar, leaving the free cicaleggio venting of resentment, among whom there may be reports of any mistake in good faith. Any system that does allow a form of criticism, possibly good-natured. A great man in times like Concetto Marchesi certainly not free, did the excitement of the theater in Rome where you could say Porro, quirites, libertatem perdimus and Caesar, instead of anger, rewarded the author. For me the answer to the charge of being self-deprecating crack is the famous photo, not a systematic call to cut off the speech .-- Mizar (ΞΆ Ursae Maioris) 17:05, 22 July 2007 (EDT ).....

Your proposal to create a corner of admirers in the bar does not convince me much. Or rather, let's do it if we're in a sub hidden, but not at the bar. Why is not the place (a meeting point and training ground for discussion and verbal scuffles) and, especially, because they watch us from outside: the bar is the place where you can fish more easily and to emphasize what is perhaps only a little shame. Ok, hide the skeletons in the closets is not the best procedure, but also make advertising too small scuffles chiozzotte ... ----{ G83 }---- 17:46, 22 July 2007 (EDT )..... Especially
Whereas the message is from someone who has been blocked for repeated copyviol, and that has escaped the block several times to give reason alone. - Brownout (msg) 21:37, 22 July 2007 (EDT ).....
Copyviol you say so!! It is not true at all!! And what if I'm stuck if I do not write like that? It is not my fault if I was stuck! Think for a moment, then: If I do not care anything about wikipedia, after the treatment to which I was (and still are) subject anyone else would have gone, slamming the door in the future and caring about everyone and everything, and instead I I'm here to understand the 'injustice suffered by me (and maybe who knows how many others?) and the danger to entrust certain responsibilities to certain people that are out of control and damage the strong man 'with a' more wrong even before the more obvious, as a true flock in 'attack the weakest link. And what you wrote above is the confirmation! Beyond me how such a selection policy of wikipedia admin may have developed as it is now ... But I like the ability of the Polish section of the Italian and later .-- 151.21.209.96 08:37, 23 July 2007 (EDT )...."

By now speak of the crack and 'became a commonplace of discussions between Wikipedians, not only to the Bar of course there are the usual criccaroli who deny the existence of their group (a bit 'as they do in Sicily mafia on the existence of the Mafia ...), but the reality 'is more and more' to the surface.

And it 'more and more' imperative to create a kind of senate Wikipedian "(as I have already 'explained) that acts as a control group of these admin, before they damage irrimediabilmene the Italian Wikipedia. Prof. Maria Rubino




Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Washington Dc Gator Bar

A reform of government so that there is a continuous supply of directors, and therefore do not become resistant and form cliques

A new "scandal" has shaken the Italian wikipedia. An anonymous (easily identifiable) sent me the following messages appeared in the comments to "The censors of Wikipedia":

1) You are absolutely right on the issue of clique of administrators in their early twenties . Should look at what happened just in the last hour.

2) tomorrow morning to link the actions blatantly corrupt performed this evening by some administrators.

3) Everything revolves around this question. http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Nyo/24_lug_2007
You Nyo first three weeks has been blocked by a single admin, without discussion, without the advice of other managers or other users.
has infiltrated the chat Journal of directors in the evening, because he understood how the situation was. E 'managed to extort a confession by the administrator valepert, confession that he later published in the bar that the page I linked.
The page was initially cleared completely, then purged the links to confession saved as a screenshot on photobucket. Now delete them also.
Valepert had confessed that the group of directors that govern Wikipedia does exist, and that the ban of Nyo had been treated by a maximum of 4 people, in private, on chat, including Aeternus and Jaqen.
chat functions as a meeting place. The admins are involved twenty, because the others are almost always absent.
Since few are all friends, they defend each other and act in a pack, getting rid of people who do not like.
Not everyone has the brain power overshadowed by neurosis. The same questions the valepert confessed.
probably in fear of being targeted and hunted as a "traitor" (as happened to the user / admin paulatz) last night has made some "crap" blocking suspected sock puppet that eventually turned out to be such.
Nyo was blocked (he moved to the criticism of administrators) three months from Jaqen without debate and opinions of the community. They work automatically and it is dangerous to question.
http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciale:Registri&type=block&page=Utente:Ruccuntu
Ruccuntu is not no sock, and valepert has not yet released.
Mr. Rubin, is actively involved.
My idea is to propose a reform of government so that there is a continuous supply of directors, and therefore do not become resistant and form cliques.

4) Note the massacre here
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Nyo/24_lug_2007 # Richesta_di_apertura_di_votazione

Of course I hasten to add to this anonymous and can 'make use of my blog for all its messages and complaints on Crack! And that goes for everyone else will have 'intention to fight any serious writing, to improve the Italian wikipedia.

I also want to bring in full as it appears on the Bar on 24.07.2007 "Dismissal of lobby reform, and sysops Administration:

".... Last night the Nyo held a lengthy discussion on the official chat of Wikipedia in which he finally managed to confess to the actual existence of the crack valepert administrators. After the undefinable

call last night for three weeks, and the complete ignorance (to ignore) in relation to the vote on the behavior of Robertoreggi, after looking for months the misbehavior of a dominant group of administrators here at Wikipedia, Nyo valepert did admit that the problem exists, is well founded and should be eradicated.

[dossier failed to respect the privacy of users involved: IRC logs are not public ndGiac83]

The admin involved are accused of violation of the rules of Wikipedia and abuse of power for the maintenance of the same and the same manipulation, exploitation of this group you need to get rid of admin and admin users should not be a genius.

valepert As stated by the mechanism criccarolo is bland. Users are indeed more or less always the same, but there are cases (like last night) where there are only two or three heads to make decisions for all (or absent or because others are not influential). But this makes the case even more damaging and serious than it would if the decisions were so many more.

The negativity of this issue are however, highlighted by Nyo in the discussion to better understand the issue is obviously good that you all read the entire text.

Interested users directly to the case of last night Jaqen Aeternus and, on that statement valepert are those who have made the decision last night. These users will proceed with a message of concern with particular emphasis on decision-makers have been the central issue of last evening.

All others who were implicitly or explicitly referred to or confirmed by valepert will undergo the same treatment, though with some discount. The minimum

deprivation remains to be done at all dell'adminship users explicitly mentioned and explicitly present in chat this morning and yesterday evening.

Cito particularly a couple of papers this morning [deleted as above, ndGiac83]: one that sheds light on what are the users who spend most of the time chatting, and that discovery will be judged by the admin and excluded from the community , and one that shows how it has changed Sogeking nickname at the time of the declarations of Helios, and finally, some fairly enlightening statements of Helios.

users directly involved in the issue of abuse are dell'adminship: Aeternus, Brownout, Fabexplosive, ChemicalBit, John, Helios, Jaqen, Laurentius, Holland, Otrebor81, Senpai, Skyluke, Sogeking, Tooby, and Wim Yerul. From his presence last night, and should include the declarations valepert Draco, his presence later this morning Loroli.

If you really want the good of Wikipedia, if you really consider yourself honest, well, it's time to admit their faults and defects, of returning to people and come out. This corruption can not go on like this. I wanted to specify that

Nyo sorry abusing the good faith of valepert Aeternus and the name, but for the good of all he (or I) had to do it. Excuse me ...." Finally

final outburst Ruccuntu and 'worthy of note:

"... The first thing I want to be released is to apologize to Valepert for the offenses that I launched, by anonymous, yesterday. I was exasperated. Regarding the rest I see that many have rummaged through my contributions and saw that I was merely to vote. Yesterday I ended up on the damn page before it was censored. In fact I started to write a speech when he disappeared and then reappeared later. The thing I did not like and I warmed up, maybe too much. I held the position of dictatorial giac83 (if you're so close there) and I made the report. If I'm wrong I'm ready to accept the consequences. Allegations of clones have already been able to verify my position. About 300 contributions achieved by editing here and there is a What we all do. I rarely plug in, partly because I felt very abused when I wrote the voice of the King Escape From that time my contribution is less convinced. Yesterday I heard thrown out without being able to defend myself. I contacted several admin, not only Montesacro, but also Al Pereira, Chemical Bit, Valepert, until I had the opportunity to talk with. JHC. which affected Snowdog. I tried to send a message to the mailing list, but I'm not good and I did not succeed. He said Freida saying that I had to register on another site and I went on tilt. If I can tell you that it is useful to the project is this: dates somehow blocked users the opportunity to speak. A bit like the famous call of the American (editor's note would be me, Louis and Bruno). After what happened yesterday (and today) I do not care to belong to this project. I know very well what is the way out finally and probably by tonight I will. What put me on an infinite sadness. Ruccuntu 18:03, 25 July 2007 (EDT) I read these

34Kb found a lot of superficiality and arrogance. I find that Jalo is a problem for this project, other than an admin. With this I close. Forever. I have instructed my lawyer to lodge a complaint at the police post in Pescara against all those who posted slanderous actions against me. Ruccuntu 18:45, July 25, 2007 (EDT)

The user was blocked indefinitely for legal threats mentioned above. - Toocome your name? 18:56, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
But how nice. Close here, perhaps without comments for or against this user and those here present. - (Y) Yuma - let's talk 19:06, 25 July 2007 (EDT) and finally ....."

'also noteworthy as the admin Yuma (happily) just as suffocating-and' used to do - any further comment on the scandalous affair, closing everything!

... And then there are some who are writing that there is no clique: but I do the pleasure! (in the words of Eduardo De Filippo) Prof. Maria Rubino The censors

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

How To Play Yuri With Local Area Network

Dare I support Clementina Forleo to

Be the Jedi Master I possomi not steal the work of the investigating magistrate judge Clementina Forleo.

Foxelli summer after I have long and strongly condemn Italian politicians, in particular "moral" D'Alema and Fassino friend with their wives. Berlusconi is not only partial has been in banking, climbing, and much discomfort I felt for Italians.

Di Pietro give full support for long battle against impossible Mastella and Keeper of the whole House that more like a circus place to legislate a. A wish is that my

Clementina Forleo can, along with Woodcock and judges all, defend the remnant of morality that is left in Italy, to free all dirt on politicians.

The Force is with you that.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

How To Use Mmp For Marriott

I'm Gone

Padawan dear,
be gone for many months I was.
difficult to explain why I declined to be silent in the my space: I felt so much sadness in not being able to write for you. Unfortunately
friend Among prove difficult times and not able to contact me. But now hope for you to write again without any problems.

Follow I still topical for you.

wishes me to do for the Prodi government difficult: the usual hope that Italian policy not prevail on intelligentsia.
Cairo compliments do I just played football in the market.
Big hug to bloggers who do I have to wait for me.

The strength that you should be.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Monster Energy T Shirts In Raleigh Nc

The Censors Wikipedia

Wikipedia and the Future of the Internet
The censors Wikipedia? Inevitable. For months we denounce a clique of directors of the Italian wikipedia on my blog criccawikipediaitaliana.blogsp ot.com / In January I wrote to Jimmy (Jimmy Wales) where the letters personally advised him to "lock" the excessive power of groups of administrators just twentysomethings ( who were taking possession of the wiki Italian, English, English, etc. ..), creating a "control group" consisting of selected graduates with over thirty years of age '. Some of these directors in their twenties (and even, unfortunately, "teenage") seem to be even "hackers" who falsify the IPs to ban those who do not like. Also we must not forget about the increasing threat of politicized groups (especially in Eastern Europe) that use of the Internet channel for misinformation campaigns do here 'cause they consider inevitable "censors wikipedia. Prof. Maria Rubino Maria Rubino
written by Prof. 7/11/2007 4:29

's article above, 'was published in La Stampa (web) in Turin in the "Angle of journalists" by Anna Masera.

I repeat my advice, written by Jimbo months ago: create a control group (dare I say a kind of senate, graduates with "seniors" at least thirty) with administrators of wikipedia to undo the damage created by 'Oscar' high school ' Criccaroli like I'm complaining in my blog.